The Supreme Court has, in a majority 5-2 decision, ruled that Assin North MP James Gyakye Quayson can no longer perform Parliamentary duties.
Related: NDC Youth Organizer- George Clashes With Professor Opoku-Agyemang Over Teachers’ Allowance
This is until the determination of the substantive case filed against him at the Supreme Court.
Related: Public Universities to Close Down as UTAG Strike Enters 4th week
A Cape Coast High Court in July 2021 nullified the election of Mr Quayson after it found he owed allegiance to Canada when filing his nomination forms to contest the polls.
Related: E-Levy : Government to Redraw Decision in Coming Days
Michael Ankomah Nimfah, a resident of the constituency who filed this election petition in January 2022, initiated another action at the Supreme Court.
Related:Interesting Times Ahead: Kennedy Agyapong Reveals Why Government Can’t Prosecute NAM1
He urged the Court to give effect to the Cape Coast High Court Judgement and prevent a further breach of the constitution by restraining the MP.
Related: Many Dead after Coup d’etat Attempt in Guinea Bissau
“If he continues to be in Parliament, he will still be in breach of the constitution. The people of Assin North have been saddled with an unqualified person for far too long.“
Related: Coronavirus Lockdown is a Flop : NDC to Akuffo- Addo
Lawyer for Mr Nimfah, Frank Davies told the Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 5, 2022.
Related:10 Leading NGO’s Shaping Africa’s Future
Attorney General Godfred Yeboah took a similar position on the matter. He insisted there cannot be any debate that the continuous stay of the legislator in Parliament is a persisting breach of the constitution that cannot be allowed to fester.
Related: I believe Asaase Radio Belongs to Akufo-Addo – Sammy Gyamfi Alleges
“On account for the uncontroverted facts of this case. It clearly indicates that the Court is faced with the patent case of unconstitutionality each passing day,” Mr Dame said.
Lawyers for the MP led by Tsatsu Tsikata disagreed.
Related: Ben Ephson Reveals Why NPP MPs Voted for Alban Bagbin Instead of Oquaye
He questioned the basis of the application pointing out that it was procedurally improper. He insisted the rules of the Supreme Court do not provide for such an injunction application.
Related: Female Politicians Who Will Influence December 2020 Elections
He argued that a party wanting this remedy ought to instead make a request to the Supreme Court for the Court to decide what steps the party ought to take.
Related: Video: Ursula Deserves Another Term at Ablekuma West – Boakye Agyarko
“The motion purports to be brought under the High Court rules. This is not the High Court. And the Supreme Court rules under rule 5 make provisions for where no express provisions are made for certain rules the Court shall prescribe such practice. A request ought to be made,” Mr Tsikata said.
The Court adjourned proceedings to April 13, 2022, to deliver its ruling.
On Wednesday, April 13, the Court said the MP should no longer hold himself as Mp or present himself in Parliament.
Related: Nsawam Road Accident: 5 Dead , 12 Injured
Justices Dordzie and Nene Amegatcher held the minority view.
Related: 50 Most Reputable Bank CEOs in Africa Announced
The case was heard by Justices Jones Dotse, Agnes Dordzie, Nene Amegatcher, Mariama Owusu, Gertrude Torkonoo, Prof Henrietta Mensah Bonsu and Emmanuel Y. Kulendi.
Related: MPs Blackmailed to Endorse Mahama
Follow all social media handles @Julliejaykanz @thehighestblog
